Larry Ellison
Forbes rank #6- Net worth
- $189.0B
- Age
- 82
- Country
- United States
- Industry
- Technology
- Wealth type
- Founder
- Background
- STEM
Documented facts
Verifiable against the sources belowWealth and source
Oracle equity
- Self-made status
- self-made
- Figure as of
- 22 August 2026
Education
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Pre-medicine
None · Left without completing · 1964
University of Chicago
Physics and Mathematics
None (one term) · Left without completing · 1966
Career
- 1970sProgrammer at Amdahl and Ampex, including a CIA database project code-named 'Oracle'.
- 1977Co-founded Software Development Laboratories, which became Oracle.
- 1977–2014CEO of Oracle.
- 2014–Chairman and Chief Technology Officer.
Interpretation
Our reading of public evidence — not private psychological factSkill stack
A categorisation of a documented career, not a measured assessment. Hover any skill for its definition.
Work philosophy
Public record centres on competitive intensity and a long personal involvement in Oracle's technical direction. Specific working habits are not well documented; treated as thin.
Mental models
Capital allocation
Oracle's growth for two decades ran through large debt-funded acquisitions — PeopleSoft (2005), Sun Microsystems (2010), Cerner (2022) — a consistently stated strategy of buying installed customer bases rather than building into them.
Economies of scale
Consolidating acquired enterprise software onto a common sales and support organisation is the publicly argued source of Oracle's margins.
Systems thinking
Oracle's 'engineered systems' strategy — selling hardware and database software tuned to each other as one stack — was publicly framed as owning the whole stack rather than a layer of it.
Each model is listed only where a specific piece of public evidence supports it. The evidence line is what you should judge — the label is just an index into it.
Public business philosophy
Bet the company early on the relational database as a commercial product, then grew by consolidating enterprise software. Publicly competitive framing — market position defined relative to named rivals.
Public ideology
Little consistent public ideological writing. Not enough public evidence to characterise; left deliberately sparse.
Sources
Grouped by the field each source supports.
net worth · rank
education · age · career timeline
Most similar in this dataset
Ranked by shared wealth type and industry, then by overlap in skills and mental models.
$236.2B · Technology
Both founders; both in Technology; shared models: capital allocation, economies of scale, systems thinking
$266.6B · Technology
Both founders; both in Technology; shared models: capital allocation, economies of scale, systems thinking
Similarity is computed from the fields in this dataset only. Two people can share every field here and have had completely different starting conditions.